1058
Provenance
5 results
Fields:
notes
| Fact | Field | Value | Latest Entry Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9a944c55c26d108750d28f030227d6f528c8e130ad23d98aecf3f36a63308601 | notes | Site within village, currently part occupied Rickerby's, an agricultural vehicle business. Occupied by a range of buildings and associated hardstanding. Relocation of the business to new premises would be required to enable redevelopment, as would subsequent demolition of the existing buildings. A scheme has been proposed in the past. Application for clearance and development of 40 homes previously permitted but has now lapsed (07/B/0304). A subsequent application to renew this consent was withdrawn (11/02912/FUL). The lapsed consent was for 40 homes but a yield of 25 units is identified through the SHLAA, which is considered more appropriate for the setting, location and market. An existing business remains operating from the site and there has been no recent indication of relocation and/or change in circumstances. There still may be potential in the long-term but no residential development is forecast within the plan period at present. | 2020-12-17 | |
| b317f2f6ffd1072e6179df6b57c5b61e31a1e47dccfdad8a78fa7ac7b766f097 | notes | Proposal for development of 40 homes previously permitted but has now lapsed. - 07/B/0304. Subsequently application to renew this consent was withdrawn - 11/02912/FUL. Opportunity for redevelopment of site, including existing buildings and hardstanding within village - previous permission lapsed prior to implementation. This consent was for 40 homes but a yield of 25 units is identified through the SHLAA, considered more appropriate for the setting and location. https://www.northumberland.gov.uk/NorthumberlandCountyCouncil/media/Planning-and-Building/planning%20policy/Studies%20and%20Evidence%20Reports/Housing%20Studies/1.%20SHLAA/Appendix-G-SHLAA-Sites-Summary-Assessment-Schedule.pdf | 2017-12-17 | |
| d433ed780ef902c55824685385deed4d8ec26e16dc5f7d72e61af79ec75fe783 | notes | Opportunity for redevelopment of an area of land that includes existing buildings and hardstanding within the village. A proposal for development of 40 homes previously permitted but has now lapsed (07/B/0304). A subsequent application to renew this consent was withdrawn (11/02912/FUL). The lapsed consent was for 40 homes but a yield of 25 units is identified through the SHLAA, which is considered more appropriate for the setting, location and market. | 2019-12-17 | |
| d49c258dd4cdf06b84e81c880f121aa4b7b2c15ad41b7688445cbd873111d3f7 | notes | Site within the village, currently part occupied Rickerby's, a long established agricultural vehicle business. There are a range of buildings in situ along with associated hardstanding. Relocation of the business to new premises would be required to enable redevelopment, as would subsequent demolition of the existing buildings. A scheme to this effect has been proposed in the past. Application for clearance and development of 40 homes was permitted back in 2009 but lapsed due to non-implementation (N/07/B/0304). A subsequent application to renew this consent was submitted but later withdrawn prior to determination (11/02912/FUL). However, as there is an existing use/business in situ, and because there has been no indication in many years that there is an intention to relocated and/or redevelop the site, there is no evidence to suggest this has potential to provide new housing. No longer considered developable/developable and future housing delivery is discounted in the SHLAA. | 2025-12-11 | |
| e87d5cea7ad0c5333a8ac81436b3dcb252c89ef4013d1510cce8c9eecfa22e48 | notes | Site within the village, currently part occupied Rickerby's, a long established agricultural vehicle business. There are a range of buildings in situ along with associated hardstanding. Relocation of the business to new premises would be required to enable redevelopment, as would subsequent demolition of the existing buildings. A scheme to this effect has been proposed in the past. Application for clearance and development of 40 homes was permitted back in 2009 but lapsed due to non-implementation (N/07/B/0304). A subsequent application to renew this consent was submitted but later withdrawn prior to determination (11/02912/FUL). The lapsed consent was for 40 homes but a yield of 25 units is identified through the SHLAA, which is considered more appropriate for the setting, location and market. As the existing business remains operating from the site, and there has been no recent indication of relocation and/or change in circumstances, it is not considered a priority for redevelopment. There still may be potential in the long-term but residential development is forecast for the long-term, beyond the plan period. | 2020-12-17 |