Search for planning and housing data

Filters

Typology

Typology

Dataset

1 selected

Dataset

Location

Location

Organisation

Organisation

Period

Period

Entry date

Which date are you interested in?

For example, 27 3 2021

Do you want to see entries since the date or after the date?

Clear

999 results

  • None

    Policy

    SuDS measures should be designed at or near the surface and located with discharge routes following the SuDS hierarchy.

    Reference
    N2.13
  • None

    Policy

    New sustainable drainage measures must look to include human scale multi-functionality within their design such as play features and increased biodiversity.

    Reference
    N2.14
  • None

    Policy

    SuDS and soft landscape maintenance plans are co-beneficial in order to minimise both current and future risk of SuDS failing due to lack of maintenance.

    Reference
    N2.15
  • None

    Policy

    Any development in Uttlesford must deliver minimum 10% biodiversity net gain in accordance with national net gain legislation, using the latest version of the Defra calculator.

    Reference
    N3.1
  • None

    Policy

    Developments of 100+ homes are expected to be ambitious in delivery of net gain and to showcase exceptional examples of ecological mitigation and enhancement. These developments (see section 5 Development Scale Coding) are expected to deliver 20% biodiversity net gain.

    Reference
    N3.2
  • None

    Policy

    Applicants must provide a baseline assessment to demonstrate an understanding of the scheme’s biodiversity opportunities and constraints.

    Reference
    N3.3
  • None

    Policy

    Proposals must follow the mitigation hierarchy approach to biodiversity net gain, starting with: ‘avoid, minimise, restore and offset’.

    Reference
    N3.4
  • None

    Policy

    Net gain delivery should follow a spatial hierarchy, with the maximum number of credits possible to be delivered onsite. This is followed, in decreasing order of preference, by offsite compensation within Uttlesford and as close as possible to the development, and then offsite compensation within Essex. Compensation elsewhere is considered to be a last resort.

    Reference
    N3.5
  • None

    Policy

    Loss of higher distinctiveness habitats must not be offset by provision of larger areas of lower distinctiveness habitats, or by habitats of a different broad habitat type, even if this delivers an overall net gain in numbers of units.

    Reference
    N3.6
  • None

    Policy

    Schemes in areas identified in the Essex LNRS and Living Landscapes should outline their compliance with the area’s habitat creation priorities by, for instance, creating new parcels of target habitats or boosting connectivity among existing parcels onsite and/or offsite.

    Reference
    N3.7